11 Comments
Feb 20, 2023·edited Feb 20, 2023Liked by TD_24

Thanks TD…great article that hits the nail on the head. The roster has deficiencies for sure, but it also has some strengths that are simply not being utilized.

Fox has led a college basketball team for, what, 17 seasons now? As one of the more outspoken critics of him, I acknowledge that it’s unlikely he has simply forgotten the craft…rather, the problem is what he’s done kinda/sort of successfully at UNR and UGA is no longer working, and he simply has zero answers because his offensive knowledge is so limited.

Worse over, as you point out, he doesn’t even try to speed things up…that small lineup he was forced to play because of foul trouble at the end of the ASU game showed some life. The ball movement was solid and in rhythm…yet it was nowhere to be found come the USC and UCLA blowouts. Further, his stubborn reliance on Lars Thiemann as the focal point of the offense is simply maddening and shows a leader that is one dimensional when it comes to coaching and running an offense. He reminds me a lot of Bill Musgrave, and we all saw what happened to the Cal offense after he was dismissed. There is hope!

Expand full comment

This team has no athletic scorers on the team, no alpha dog’s.. zero on this roster. I don’t care if they were healthy, result wouldn’t be much different. That’s why you see them getting blown out at the start of every game. Nobody want to shoot the ball, the reason is nobody Fox has recruited us an athletic scorer, nobody! Fox recruiting is awful !

Expand full comment

Adaptability doesn't need to look like Bellarmine's Oops! All Passes offense. But it needs to at least involve pushing your strengths when you can. Can't just originate a scheme with "assume an NBA roster."

Expand full comment

When they scored 92 (92!) against furd, how much of that was furd and how much of that was Cal doing something different? If it was Cal doing something different why didn’t they stick with it?

Expand full comment
Removed (Banned)Feb 20, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment