I'm not debating that USC, UCLA, and Furd were better than Cal while Dykes was here. The gap closed a bit under Wilcox, but now seems to be widening again. Judging a coach on his record against CA teams is not the best metric (not the worst either); it depends on how good those teams were during his tenure. Stanford in particular has not…
I'm not debating that USC, UCLA, and Furd were better than Cal while Dykes was here. The gap closed a bit under Wilcox, but now seems to be widening again. Judging a coach on his record against CA teams is not the best metric (not the worst either); it depends on how good those teams were during his tenure. Stanford in particular has not been a constant; they were much better for a run of years during peak Harbargh-Shaw than they were before or after.
I'm not debating that USC, UCLA, and Furd were better than Cal while Dykes was here. The gap closed a bit under Wilcox, but now seems to be widening again. Judging a coach on his record against CA teams is not the best metric (not the worst either); it depends on how good those teams were during his tenure. Stanford in particular has not been a constant; they were much better for a run of years during peak Harbargh-Shaw than they were before or after.