Not wrathful disagreement, as while I personally have serious doubts that Wilcox is the answer, he nonetheless pulled the trigger on the late-season dismissal of Musgrave and AngusтАжthis absolutely needed to happen, and probably shouldтАЩve happened earlier in the year. Combined with the hiring of Spavital, it at least was a proactive showing and good to see.
IMO, the team will absolutely be better next year, though with the difficult schedule, it may not result in a bowl-eligible season. 2024, though, weтАЩll hopefully see a breakout Wilcox/Spav year!
Yes, should have a two year window to evaluate the Spavital era, particularly because it doesnтАЩt look Cal will have an experienced, highly skilled QB this year like they did with the Davis Webb scenario.
More sunshine pumping. LOL
IMHO, let's give Wilcox a chance to prove himself differently. ANd write off the Musgraves sub-period.
Wrathful disagreement in 3....2...1....
Not wrathful disagreement, as while I personally have serious doubts that Wilcox is the answer, he nonetheless pulled the trigger on the late-season dismissal of Musgrave and AngusтАжthis absolutely needed to happen, and probably shouldтАЩve happened earlier in the year. Combined with the hiring of Spavital, it at least was a proactive showing and good to see.
IMO, the team will absolutely be better next year, though with the difficult schedule, it may not result in a bowl-eligible season. 2024, though, weтАЩll hopefully see a breakout Wilcox/Spav year!
Yes, should have a two year window to evaluate the Spavital era, particularly because it doesnтАЩt look Cal will have an experienced, highly skilled QB this year like they did with the Davis Webb scenario.