Thankfully the reboot is in progress. 2 new 4 star freshmen guards. Tucker, Blacksher out of eligibility. I'm sure Campbell will be encouraged to move on too.
Counterpoint, and a little respectful pushback, BP…from both a statistical and eye-test perspective, he looked overmatched at the ACC level.
Barring massive improvement, it’s tough to see how Cal’s record improves next year without a major talent bump at that position…if Cal’s gonna make any type of a run at .500 and the postseason, they need more on both ends of the floor from a guy that played 26 mpg.
If he’s playing 10 mpg, absolutely we would be happy with what he gives you, and it would be awesome to see him return to his ‘23-‘24 line, especially from beyond the arc where he went 25-61 (41%). He’s really struggled with his shot the other 2 seasons, however. And as cp mentioned below, is that what he wants for his SR year, to return in a diminished role? Dunno.
Either way, the staff has to find a way to strengthen the entire backcourt, and with Omot leaving as expected, they’re pretty thin yet again across the board.
Sigh. Tough to rebuild a program when you’re replacing 8 scholarships every year.
I agree, I just also don't think other teams see a starter in him that can potentially bring them to the dance outside of a smaller mid-major that can't give him NIL. I don't know what options he has, we unintentionally exposed him.
43% TS% (team worst among rotation players besides Mahoney), worst 3 pt % on 4th most attempts, lowest winshare/40 among heavy rotation players, negative OBPM. He's like an AAAA player; he's (and has been) a very good mid-major player but is a 10 MPG player at this level. Is that what he wants for his final season?
Here’s hoping we don’t have another team reset which would probably mean another sub .500 season.
Stojacovich and Petraitus are key.
We need a full reset in the backcourt.
Thankfully the reboot is in progress. 2 new 4 star freshmen guards. Tucker, Blacksher out of eligibility. I'm sure Campbell will be encouraged to move on too.
I like Campbell. He stepped up when he needed to. He is best off the bench. I think he stays.
Counterpoint, and a little respectful pushback, BP…from both a statistical and eye-test perspective, he looked overmatched at the ACC level.
Barring massive improvement, it’s tough to see how Cal’s record improves next year without a major talent bump at that position…if Cal’s gonna make any type of a run at .500 and the postseason, they need more on both ends of the floor from a guy that played 26 mpg.
I think he plays a role more on the lines of what Tucker did this year, we would be really happy with him.
If he’s playing 10 mpg, absolutely we would be happy with what he gives you, and it would be awesome to see him return to his ‘23-‘24 line, especially from beyond the arc where he went 25-61 (41%). He’s really struggled with his shot the other 2 seasons, however. And as cp mentioned below, is that what he wants for his SR year, to return in a diminished role? Dunno.
Either way, the staff has to find a way to strengthen the entire backcourt, and with Omot leaving as expected, they’re pretty thin yet again across the board.
Sigh. Tough to rebuild a program when you’re replacing 8 scholarships every year.
I agree, I just also don't think other teams see a starter in him that can potentially bring them to the dance outside of a smaller mid-major that can't give him NIL. I don't know what options he has, we unintentionally exposed him.
43% TS% (team worst among rotation players besides Mahoney), worst 3 pt % on 4th most attempts, lowest winshare/40 among heavy rotation players, negative OBPM. He's like an AAAA player; he's (and has been) a very good mid-major player but is a 10 MPG player at this level. Is that what he wants for his final season?
I agree. He is a solid contributor; gives a spark most of the time.