I read that article, and liked it. It’s refreshing to read something written with a little flavor and attitude every once in a while. Curtis is generally a solid writer.
I read that article, and liked it. It’s refreshing to read something written with a little flavor and attitude every once in a while. Curtis is generally a solid writer.
I know I am being an over sensitive Cal fan. I have not read enough to give summary judgment of Mr. Curtis. That being said, nor does Mr. Curtis have enough of a sample size to call Mr. Madsen a liar.
Disagree. All he does is report on questions asked by himself and other reporters with his questions being leading questions. He and Faraudo are trash. If u want to skip reading trash, just listen to the live interviews on Calbears.com, some reporters ask meaningful questions. But not Curtis nor Faraudo.
I read that article, and liked it. It’s refreshing to read something written with a little flavor and attitude every once in a while. Curtis is generally a solid writer.
I know I am being an over sensitive Cal fan. I have not read enough to give summary judgment of Mr. Curtis. That being said, nor does Mr. Curtis have enough of a sample size to call Mr. Madsen a liar.
Disagree. All he does is report on questions asked by himself and other reporters with his questions being leading questions. He and Faraudo are trash. If u want to skip reading trash, just listen to the live interviews on Calbears.com, some reporters ask meaningful questions. But not Curtis nor Faraudo.