Curtis and his cohort Faraudo are trash. They ask leading questions where the answer agrees with the question to provide click bate. I suppose in this day and age that is good reporting. I view it as trash. TD here at WFC asks way more in-depth questions IMO.
Curtis and his cohort Faraudo are trash. They ask leading questions where the answer agrees with the question to provide click bate. I suppose in this day and age that is good reporting. I view it as trash. TD here at WFC asks way more in-depth questions IMO.
Indeed, I feel like I appreciate W4C and BI articles more than either Curtis or Faraudo, both of whom give me the impression theyтАЩre bitter that they must or choose to write about Cal, at all. Maybe Fox Sports will hire them.
Curtis and his cohort Faraudo are trash. They ask leading questions where the answer agrees with the question to provide click bate. I suppose in this day and age that is good reporting. I view it as trash. TD here at WFC asks way more in-depth questions IMO.
what can i say I'm a smooth operator ЁЯдл
yes, yes you are
Take your bows. G┬оя╕ПEAT is stingy with compliments. ЁЯШЙ
yes, yes I am
Indeed, I feel like I appreciate W4C and BI articles more than either Curtis or Faraudo, both of whom give me the impression theyтАЩre bitter that they must or choose to write about Cal, at all. Maybe Fox Sports will hire them.