Greg still seems pretty confident that an ACC invite will be happening, so I guess I'll go with that.
Reports of "they still don't have the votes yet" don't mean much to me. Yeah, no shit . . . if they had the votes they would have voted already. Question is, are they moving towards having the votes?
Greg still seems pretty confident that an ACC invite will be happening, so I guess I'll go with that.
Reports of "they still don't have the votes yet" don't mean much to me. Yeah, no shit . . . if they had the votes they would have voted already. Question is, are they moving towards having the votes?
Greg still seems pretty confident that an ACC invite will be happening, so I guess I'll go with that.
Reports of "they still don't have the votes yet" don't mean much to me. Yeah, no shit . . . if they had the votes they would have voted already. Question is, are they moving towards having the votes?
How long can/will negotiations to get those votes potentially go on before ACC decides it ain't happening, schedules a meeting, and votes no?
I prefer to believe that the delay is being caused by the hashing out of details that the holdouts need in order to be swayed to a yes.
I have to guess that if the answer was definitely no, they would have said something. It has to be because they are still negotiating.
Probably they want to have this settled before the football season starts, but thatтАЩs not guaranteed either.