Let’s put calimony aside. Why did those regents vote no on ucla going to the big ten. Ucla is in debt, and that was their lifeline. Calimony had already been introduced, but those cal alum regents still voted no. It was all about ego’s!
Let’s put calimony aside. Why did those regents vote no on ucla going to the big ten. Ucla is in debt, and that was their lifeline. Calimony had already been introduced, but those cal alum regents still voted no. It was all about ego’s!
So you're taking it out on us? It's my understanding, under some states' laws, such as North Carolina, both UNC and NCState must be in the same conference. One can understand why public schools would be subject to such limitations, if only to simplify costs.
Let’s put calimony aside. Why did those regents vote no on ucla going to the big ten. Ucla is in debt, and that was their lifeline. Calimony had already been introduced, but those cal alum regents still voted no. It was all about ego’s!
So you're taking it out on us? It's my understanding, under some states' laws, such as North Carolina, both UNC and NCState must be in the same conference. One can understand why public schools would be subject to such limitations, if only to simplify costs.