4 Comments
тна Return to thread

Explain it to the U.C. Regents, who thought differently.

Expand full comment

From what I remember the payments were noted as a recommendation not a requirement.

Expand full comment

That is correct. The President is directed to return at a future meeting with a recommendation for a payment between $2 and $10m. Of course, that recommendation could be zero.

Expand full comment

If you want neither a recommendation or requirement, then ask UCLA to take the California out of their name so they can be fully autonomous. Problem solved.

Expand full comment