38 Comments
User's avatar
Rugbear's avatar

Utah didn't limit Mendoza, they limited our o-line who could not protect the poor kid.

Expand full comment
OC Bear's avatar

and the Line domination (both sides) also 'limited' our run game: 66 yards rushing is not gonna cut it.

Expand full comment
Winebear's avatar

Not when you give up 300+

Expand full comment
OC Bear's avatar

Agreed, that's why I mentioned thier Line domination on both sides of the ball.

Expand full comment
Stanfurdstinks's avatar

I like Justin Wilcox a lot and I think he caught a tough break at Cal but I don't see any way out of this misery without a reboot.

Expand full comment
Bowlesman 80's avatar

I think JW is overrated. Honestly, we have better talent than our coaching shows.

Expand full comment
OC Bear's avatar

Sure, he's a good guy personally. High character. Treats people right.

But, what is so "tough" about him making bank at Cal? Any place else and he'd have been fired years ago. It's a good thing that we don't play Fresno State as a certain HC in the Valley would coach rings around Justin.

Expand full comment
Toohandy's avatar

And he was fired at Cal by that terrible AD, Sandy Barbour because of a bad season and he didn't have the contract which would have protected him.

Expand full comment
Bowlesman 80's avatar

Already has.

Fresno State Football > Cal football

Expand full comment
GoldenSD81's avatar

Wilcox didn’t catch a tough break. He has been given more resources and time than he probably deserves.

Expand full comment
AndDriveDriveDrive's avatar

It’s frustrating because it’s like we are playing in the SEC of a few years ago (RIP PAC12) but we are unable to capitalize on any opportunities to experience that glory for ourselves. The fact that it is the last year of it and we aren’t riding the high is really a gut punch.

Expand full comment
ak_A_bear's avatar

On my I-5 drive north yesterday, stopped listening at the missed FG and switched to Husky-Duck game, which was entertaining plus no irritation factor. Then the Beaver Bruin tilt which was satisfying.

Expand full comment
sacman701's avatar

Looks like we aren't the only team in the conference with s**t kickoff coverage. SC just let ND take one to the house.

Expand full comment
Dominick Damiani's avatar

It just wasn't the inability of the offense to move the ball against the talented Utes defense. But, the inability of the Cal coaching staff especially the Defensive coaches to corral the elusive Utes QB. The CAL secondary was covering their receivers with a blanket. But, they couldn't contain the QB from running for a ton of First downs. The Cal coaching should have placed a spy on the QB to limit his ability to run as much as he did to get the Utes out of trouble.

Expand full comment
Bowlesman 80's avatar

Not to mention a bit of procedure for corralling a runaway QB, who might cut back inside, while the defenders overshoot.

Expand full comment
Dominick Damiani's avatar

If I remember correctly the Defense only rushed 3 most of the time keeping the coverage in the secondary. The Utes O line were able to keep D line at bay . This gave Barnes all the time to scramble and when a gap opened up He was on his way because most defensive players were way down field in coverage

Expand full comment
Bowlesman 80's avatar

Something short on our coaching.

Expand full comment
cleancutmedia's avatar

if we kept getting sacked.. doesn't it make sense to create some quick slants and cuts to provide Mendoza some quick release targets? I know I am simplifying things but the man was being sacked left and right. Put him in a position he can succeed or at least not go backwards.. literally.

Expand full comment
Toohandy's avatar

Tell me, how many times was he sacked.

Expand full comment
Bowlesman 80's avatar

Without looking, I want to say 2-3.

Expand full comment
O.Overall's avatar

I couldn’t watch game, why did Finley come in?

Expand full comment
Justbear's avatar

Mendoza got crushed on a sack and came off the field

Expand full comment
Bowlesman 80's avatar

Yeah, I kind of wondered if that was a payback for our lineman running into and some other rough tackles on their QB.

Expand full comment
Bowlesman 80's avatar

Yes. He had some difficulties.

Expand full comment
Bowlesman 80's avatar

Fun Fact: Jack Velling is a go-to for 2 or more TD passes as UCLA defense gets torched. Sound familiar?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 15, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Bowlesman 80's avatar

Uggh. Feeling a bit burned after daring to hope for an upset against Utah.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 15, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Bowlesman 80's avatar

Your last sentence. BINGO.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 15, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Winebear's avatar

‘Maybe we should recruit better and coach ‘em up.’ Thanks again JW

Expand full comment
Bowlesman 80's avatar

We have the talent, we're consistently out coached.

Expand full comment
sacman701's avatar

Our talent level isn't close to Oregon or Washington or SC, but we should be able to hang with Utah and Oregon State.

Expand full comment
Toohandy's avatar

Oregon State has great talent. Their QB transfer was named player of the week in the PAC12 last week. Look what they did this week.

Expand full comment
Bowlesman 80's avatar

Welp. Good coaching equalizes, when our talent is as close as it is. Today, we made Utah's backup QB look great.

Expand full comment
Jimmy Chitwood's avatar

The >70-yard TD by a safety-turned-RB on a clear running play should have ended the Wilcox era.

Expand full comment
Bowlesman 80's avatar

A cumulative weight of such blunders, yes, but not by itself.

The trouble is, there's always something.

Expand full comment
Toohandy's avatar

Where did you get the info on our talent being good. IT'S NOT! And, we lost our best O lineman last week, number 71 (I still can't remember how to spell his name)He was the guy who consistently opened holes in the right A gap. Our WR's are really 2nd class to the rest of the conference. And, our DB"s are also. It's hard to recruit transfers when they have to have above a 3 point to get in. Stanford has the same problem. Other un named schools just have to have them be enrolled without any grade requirements.

Expand full comment
Bowlesman 80's avatar

Well, no argument that we’re holding the academic country club snob line to our own detriment. Yes, we could be better off with a roster loaded with 5 stars. But, I also, try to show faith in the people we have. Especially since more than one player probably reads this.

Expand full comment