It continues to boggle my mind how slowly the pertinent information has been dribbling out. First we don't know if they're out because of positive tests or contact tracing. Then we learn they all tested positive, but have no knowledge on symptomatic cases. Now it turns out 3/4ths (or so) of the positive tests were symptomatic.
Is there some reason (other than ignorance of the importance of this info) that it's been dribbled out like this?
Cal players who tested COVID-positive should be available at Stanford
31 symptomatic positives and they are mad that they had to test for Covid?
Does anyone know if USC had the option to refuse rescheduling and instead take the forfeit win? And if so, am I supposed to stop hating them?
I blame Buh, and the City of Berkeley, and Libruls for worrying about a mild fake flu.
It continues to boggle my mind how slowly the pertinent information has been dribbling out. First we don't know if they're out because of positive tests or contact tracing. Then we learn they all tested positive, but have no knowledge on symptomatic cases. Now it turns out 3/4ths (or so) of the positive tests were symptomatic.
Is there some reason (other than ignorance of the importance of this info) that it's been dribbled out like this?