2) "If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither on your side, pound the table."
FSU is basically doing the 3rd option since neither the facts nor the law seem to be on their side. But presumably they will be able to use the lawsuit to rile up their…
2) "If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither on your side, pound the table."
FSU is basically doing the 3rd option since neither the facts nor the law seem to be on their side. But presumably they will be able to use the lawsuit to rile up their fans and donors in support much like a certain former US president who finds himself in perpetual legal jeopardy. Also probably using this to pressure ACC with internal politics to get appeasement (like getting an oversized share of Cal, Furd, and SMU's media money). They're the U$C of the ACC.
But everything I've read indicates that FSU will be in the ACC until it decides to buy itself out. Big 10 deal runs through 2030 and SEC runs through 2034. I could see them buying out on the SEC timeline.
1) PUNCH TWIST
2) "If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither on your side, pound the table."
FSU is basically doing the 3rd option since neither the facts nor the law seem to be on their side. But presumably they will be able to use the lawsuit to rile up their fans and donors in support much like a certain former US president who finds himself in perpetual legal jeopardy. Also probably using this to pressure ACC with internal politics to get appeasement (like getting an oversized share of Cal, Furd, and SMU's media money). They're the U$C of the ACC.
But everything I've read indicates that FSU will be in the ACC until it decides to buy itself out. Big 10 deal runs through 2030 and SEC runs through 2034. I could see them buying out on the SEC timeline.