14 Comments

Merch? did I read merch?? :shutupandtakemymoney:

Expand full comment
author

Say what now?

Expand full comment

Woodson & Antzoulatos, per Wilcox, out for the season ~ "lower body injuries". Reported today 8/24 in his presser. Damn shame for both, especially Woodson given he was in the fight for a lot of playing time.

Expand full comment

No more LBI's

Expand full comment

I was hoping Fall camp would reveal a solid OL. It didn't. I'm not concerned with the Saffell retirement given Driscoll is bigger and more athletic. Craig missed most of Fall camp and it now is realistic to ask, "Will, will you ever play the majority of one season prior to your eligibility running out?" I sure hope the answer to that is a resounding "yes". It is a shocker that Daltoso appears to have held his starting spot. It says more about the quality of the 2nd and 3rd string RTs in the program than it does Daltoso, cuz we know his ceiling and it ain't high! So, OL has to be our gravest concern, yet again, this year. One can hope that when the lineup is released that there has been a major shake up at OL. Else we are back to quick passes and a limited running game. Not sure anyone can endure another year of conference worst offense. As importantly Garbers needs to have solid OL play for him to be successful, else he will probably be running for his life (think injury).

With all due respect to Christopher_h I'm not at all worried about the D. Our DL play will be quality, which will aid all the units behind it.

Go Bears!

Expand full comment

Correction: U$C's FPI projected conference W-L is 6.5-2.5 (72.3%). "Raw" W-L is 8-1 (88.9%)

Expand full comment
author

Feels like we're really underestimating UCLA. That offense was clicking last year and they brought almost everyone back.

Expand full comment
author

But crucially no Demetric Felton

Expand full comment
author

And they still have an Azzinaro defense.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the projections and analysis. I think it's hard to rank Cal higher than 5th but it's satisfying to see that Furd is projected below us.

Expand full comment

Agreed. Until the Bears get over the hump under Wilcox and quit playing games that could literally go either way based on 1 or 2 plays, they're looking at an annual 7-5/6-6/5-7 struggle for bowl eligibility.

Expand full comment
author

I was feeling uncharacteristically optimistic when I ranked them--and also rushing through the process. If I sat down and thought harder about it, then it's entirely possible I'd bring us down a bit.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

FWIW SP+ was more accurate than FPI 2 seasons ago and IMO this year as well.

I just keep track of these things through the season - and use both computers to inform my rankings - so might as well include them.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

liked

Expand full comment