This may be way too much data/analysis (I'm an analyst by trade so...) but it would be cool to try to align the PFF grades with the post game fan ratings, see where the differences are because I think fan ratings are heavily influenced by expectations and theoretically the PFF grades aren't as much...
Good, and interesting, analysis. The next step would be to make it easy to equate the performance with the strength of opposition. Perhaps RPI? It would be interesting to see how often the everything is great scores are against struggling opposition, and the everything is terrible scores are against the best opposition (intuitively, you would expect this), or if there is a significant deviation from that. And what caliber of team are most of the rock fights against?
PFF in Review: The Three Types of Cal Games Under Justin Wilcox
Strong and Balanced = 🟨 Gold
Rockfight = 🟦 Blue
Everything is Bad = 🟥 Red
If it's all the same to you, that would be my only suggestion for this otherwise outstanding analysis.
This may be way too much data/analysis (I'm an analyst by trade so...) but it would be cool to try to align the PFF grades with the post game fan ratings, see where the differences are because I think fan ratings are heavily influenced by expectations and theoretically the PFF grades aren't as much...
Good, and interesting, analysis. The next step would be to make it easy to equate the performance with the strength of opposition. Perhaps RPI? It would be interesting to see how often the everything is great scores are against struggling opposition, and the everything is terrible scores are against the best opposition (intuitively, you would expect this), or if there is a significant deviation from that. And what caliber of team are most of the rock fights against?
Very interesting and thanks. Some heavy quant dudes at WFC to be sure!