It seems that once again, deficiencies in the o-line are a big part of several problems. Trouble running inside, better, but still inconsistent outside running (because interior running is not a concern for defenses), issues with keeping RBs healthy and QB upright, passing game inconsistencies probably related to being hurried, problems …
It seems that once again, deficiencies in the o-line are a big part of several problems. Trouble running inside, better, but still inconsistent outside running (because interior running is not a concern for defenses), issues with keeping RBs healthy and QB upright, passing game inconsistencies probably related to being hurried, problems with placekicks, and a defense constantly under pressure.
And WtFC posts about makeshift and shifting o-line personnel, and lack of depth, and questioning offensive theory (possibly constrained by issues up front?). Have I read these storylines before?
Very few 9-12 win seasons, and top quarter of conference standings and rankings, occur behind out-manned o-lines. Most good o-lines produce top quadrant teams.
It seems that once again, deficiencies in the o-line are a big part of several problems. Trouble running inside, better, but still inconsistent outside running (because interior running is not a concern for defenses), issues with keeping RBs healthy and QB upright, passing game inconsistencies probably related to being hurried, problems with placekicks, and a defense constantly under pressure.
And WtFC posts about makeshift and shifting o-line personnel, and lack of depth, and questioning offensive theory (possibly constrained by issues up front?). Have I read these storylines before?
Very few 9-12 win seasons, and top quarter of conference standings and rankings, occur behind out-manned o-lines. Most good o-lines produce top quadrant teams.