I agree with this. I would rather Cal not follow UCLA/USC into the Big 10. Since 1965 Cal is 12-48 vs USC and 18-43 vs UCLA. Cal will end up a whipping boy in the Big 10 and for what? So they can be perennial patsies in a big time conference?Much better to play teams on similar footing so they have a chance to consistently competitive an…
I agree with this. I would rather Cal not follow UCLA/USC into the Big 10. Since 1965 Cal is 12-48 vs USC and 18-43 vs UCLA. Cal will end up a whipping boy in the Big 10 and for what? So they can be perennial patsies in a big time conference?Much better to play teams on similar footing so they have a chance to consistently competitive and don't have to bow to the almighty dollar. I can't see Cal stomaching where big time college football is going anyway (coaches making 10mil, star players making millions per season with entourage of agents like one and done basketball players). Time for Cal to get it's priorities in order.
I agree with this. I would rather Cal not follow UCLA/USC into the Big 10. Since 1965 Cal is 12-48 vs USC and 18-43 vs UCLA. Cal will end up a whipping boy in the Big 10 and for what? So they can be perennial patsies in a big time conference?Much better to play teams on similar footing so they have a chance to consistently competitive and don't have to bow to the almighty dollar. I can't see Cal stomaching where big time college football is going anyway (coaches making 10mil, star players making millions per season with entourage of agents like one and done basketball players). Time for Cal to get it's priorities in order.