5 Comments
User's avatar
David's avatar

I'm worried that we'll have trouble with a mobile QB who likes to run as much as pass. Will be big challenge for the Defense.

GoldenBear68's avatar

Guys, I truly get the hopeful enthusiasm but WF is a really good football team and Cal has yet to prove that it can play at the same level. We’re not even sure how well JKS can adapt to this new offense — QB2 did well because he used the pocket which allowed our not so great OL to protect him slightly longer than it could JKS who has a tendency to roll out when threatened and is not nearly as mobile as QB2. Plus, if we are still fielding an anemic running attack WF will very likely just eat our lunch with ugly blitzes and we will be looking at a very long evening.

Toohandy's avatar

I hate to say it but I agree with you. However if JKS stays in the pocket and makes his reads then things might be much better than his poor performance with

Clemson.

81Bear's avatar

Our defense made the unlv qb look like lamar Jackson so i’m a little skeptical that they can contain lopez

justbearly's avatar

A QB who can run it, and is an accurate passer, a receiver or two who can elude and catch it, a decent running game, a very good front four and linebacker, not a bad secondary, a 5-1 record so far, what's the problem? Go Bears!