The above play, early in the second half, should obviously have been called pass interference, but only the refs could have called it. What I want to know is whether giving coaches one or two chances in a game (maybe one each half with no carryover if one is not used in the first half) to allow a coach to ask for a review of a call (or no call) to overturn the call (or no call) of the official on a certain aspect of a play (though how that should be done, in terms of the description that should be required, could be tricky).
Downside to my proposal is that is slows the game. But I think most fans would approve of this rule change. What do you think?
Cal football recruiting 2023 early visits from Marcus Ratcliffe, Hunter Clegg
Gobears49
Not on point, but this is the most recent W4C football article.
Want to ask a non-Cal football question.
https://ftw.usatoday.com/lists/tee-higgins-refs-missed-call-jalen-ramsey-pass-interference-no-call-reaction-super-bowl
The above play, early in the second half, should obviously have been called pass interference, but only the refs could have called it. What I want to know is whether giving coaches one or two chances in a game (maybe one each half with no carryover if one is not used in the first half) to allow a coach to ask for a review of a call (or no call) to overturn the call (or no call) of the official on a certain aspect of a play (though how that should be done, in terms of the description that should be required, could be tricky).
Downside to my proposal is that is slows the game. But I think most fans would approve of this rule change. What do you think?
RR II is a BEAST!!!! Would love to have him running up the middle!