It's apparent that Mark Fox teams are better when their go-to guy is out. When the ball went in to Bradley, Shepard, or Askew, it's followed by a bunch of standing around because the ball rarely comes back out while the 'scorer' goes one-on-four. Why work your ass off to get open when 9 times out of 10 you won't be rewarded? The play m…
It's apparent that Mark Fox teams are better when their go-to guy is out. When the ball went in to Bradley, Shepard, or Askew, it's followed by a bunch of standing around because the ball rarely comes back out while the 'scorer' goes one-on-four. Why work your ass off to get open when 9 times out of 10 you won't be rewarded? The play making and ball movement while Bradley was out, and last game vs CU was much improved. Our scorers need to become reliable assist artists which opens up the game for them and everyone else.
It's apparent that Mark Fox teams are better when their go-to guy is out. When the ball went in to Bradley, Shepard, or Askew, it's followed by a bunch of standing around because the ball rarely comes back out while the 'scorer' goes one-on-four. Why work your ass off to get open when 9 times out of 10 you won't be rewarded? The play making and ball movement while Bradley was out, and last game vs CU was much improved. Our scorers need to become reliable assist artists which opens up the game for them and everyone else.
I do think there is something to this.