Discussion about this post

User's avatar
KetamineCal's avatar

The one issue with the high school recruitment strategy is that those players can just as easily bolt. I'm hoping that Madsen can build some loyalty, but I believe there's been a mental shift among high schoolers. Changing jobs is extremely common nowadays, especially as a means of promotion. A lot of the same logic applies to college athletes now that non-competes are effectively banned. And basketball by its nature and small roster size makes the upside of transferring and the impact of transfers bigger than in football.

The stable equilibrium may to just get faster at "onboarding" talent. The possible strategies are 1) pull in the best players available at any level, design around them, and develop a few key skills for newcomers to contribute quickly or 2) set up a fairly rigid system and recruit specifically to each position. The overall talent level will be higher with (1) but the learning curve may be shorter with (2).

I honestly have no idea which formula works these days. We may just be in for a lot of variance, which we already see among elite programs (and probably why we see so many tourney upsets). Good luck, Mark, and I hope everyone is contributing some NIL money because the old system is gone.

Expand full comment
Erlyn madsen's avatar

YES! YES! YES, He can !!!

But the immense amount of $ UCLA and OREGON have to sweeten their offers to kids is really way out of proportion to fairness.

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts