Hello, Tom, this is TwistNHook responding to your comment. Firstly, thank you very much for reading the post. I appreciate it
Secondly, I did not see where I referred to the FSU lawsuit as one sided. I do think that FSU is trying to tell a story that is so preposterous it cannot be believed. FSU was bullied into signing the contracts etc.…
Hello, Tom, this is TwistNHook responding to your comment. Firstly, thank you very much for reading the post. I appreciate it
Secondly, I did not see where I referred to the FSU lawsuit as one sided. I do think that FSU is trying to tell a story that is so preposterous it cannot be believed. FSU was bullied into signing the contracts etc. You lose credibility with Judges etc when you take extreme positions like that
Clemson's position is more straight ahead (i.e these deals don't work for us anymore, please let us out). I felt that Clemson and ACC took more reasonable positions with their lawsuits than FSU and that is why I describe them differently.
Hello, Tom, this is TwistNHook responding to your comment. Firstly, thank you very much for reading the post. I appreciate it
Secondly, I did not see where I referred to the FSU lawsuit as one sided. I do think that FSU is trying to tell a story that is so preposterous it cannot be believed. FSU was bullied into signing the contracts etc. You lose credibility with Judges etc when you take extreme positions like that
Clemson's position is more straight ahead (i.e these deals don't work for us anymore, please let us out). I felt that Clemson and ACC took more reasonable positions with their lawsuits than FSU and that is why I describe them differently.