Discussion about this post

User's avatar
AndyPanda's avatar

The positive direction of the NIL program is the key if Cal is to approach levels Old Blues and W4C Oski Disciples long for. The Bears have some quality players, and that tantalizes everyone. But the primary reason various units don't perform better (not up to some expectations, but really, fully up to most reasonable expectations) is still that Cal's overall breadth and depth and versatility of talent and experience isn't nearly sufficient. It is possible to scheme for and around the Bears' best players, and take advantage of areas of vulnerability. And if anything goes wrong, it gets exponentially more lopsided fast.

Expand full comment
harmonpreservationsociety's avatar

I think this is all fair and pretty spot-on. I'm a little surprised to see so many grades of C and higher in the reader poll - in what world is a likely losing record (and almost assuredly yet another losing conference record) a passing grade?

I think Spav and Bloesch have done ok, and I think Bloesch's shoring up of the OL will help recruit some more bodies his way. And I agree that the defense's backslide is deeply concerning. One would think that Sirmon's job is in question, but Wilcox, as a former DC and defense-minded coach, also has to shoulder the blame. In the last 4 years, Duke has had a single 4-star recruit. Duke has a bunch of nobodies, but their defense is ranked 20th in SP+ (ours is 54th). They run crazy schemes and blitz packages and keep opponents guessing. That's coaching.

Expand full comment
30 more comments...

No posts